Theoretical Frameworks and Practical Solutions in Higher Education Management: A Comprehensive Analysis of Global Trends and Institutional Dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71420/ijref.v3i2.257Keywords:
Higher Education Management, University Governance, New Public Management, Strategic Management, Financial Sustainability, Digital Transformation, Quality Assurance, Shared Leadership, Resource-Based View, Institutional ParadoxesAbstract
Higher education institutions (HEIs) are experiencing a paradigm shift resulting from marketization, digitalization, financial constraints, and the need for accountability. The present paper reviews the existing theories and practices of modern higher education management. The paper discusses the classical governance models of bureaucracy, collegial, and politics as well as new paradigms of New Public Management (NPM) and Enterprise. The paper highlights the tensions between academic and control paradigms. Tensions between autonomy and management, collegial and enterprise, and tradition and innovation are the biggest paradoxes facing modern higher education. The major challenges of university management are: financial sustainability, administrative overload, quality assurance, bureaucratic red tape, and digitalization. Decentralized information systems, low capacity for technological adoption, and market competition for scarce resources are major challenges to university management. Differences between public and private institutions are also explored, particularly regarding political interference, profit orientation, and employment conditions. The paper suggests both strategic and operational solutions based on strategic management, Resource-Based View (RBV), Lean principles, diversification of revenue streams, and digitalization. Transformational and shared leadership are necessary for dealing with change and paradox. Leaderships development and digital governance are the instruments for building resilient institutions. The paper concludes that there is a need for modern HEIs to reconcile all the challenges and paradoxes through a strategic integration of planning, finance, operations, and academic values. Instead of a choice between managerialism and collegium, it is necessary to develop a hybrid model of governance capable of managing paradoxes and tensions for academic survival.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adnane Amghar, Hajar Bhar, Bouchra Aiboud Benchekroun

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



