Artificial Intelligence Adoption and Perceived Audit Engagement Performance: An Empirical Study of Moroccan Auditors

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71420/ijref.v3i10-2.433

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, financial audit, perceived audit performance, Technology Acceptance Model, Moroccan audit firms

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is progressively transforming audit practices, yet its effects are mainly documented in advanced economies. In Morocco, a market characterized by intermediate digital maturity and a fragmented audit landscape, empirical studies mostly address the intention or readiness to adopt AI rather than its effective use in audit engagements. This study examines the relationship between the effective use of AI tools, perceived benefits and change in practices, on the one hand, and perceived audit engagement performance, on the other. Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model, the study relies on a questionnaire survey of a non-probability sample of 40 auditors working in Morocco; data were analyzed using multiple linear regression. The model shows high explanatory power (R² = 0.888; p < 0.001), and only the effective use of AI tools is significantly associated with perceived performance (β = 0.937; p < 0.001). The study shifts the focus from adoption intention to effective use and suggests that, in an emerging context, the concrete implementation of AI tools matters more than perceptions of their benefits. The non-probability nature and small size of the sample limit the generalizability of the findings; the perceptual measure of performance, collected from the same respondents, raises common method bias concerns, and the observed associations do not allow causal conclusions.

Author Biography

Faissal Eddaoudi, Laboratoire de Recherche en Commerce et Gestion; École Nationale de Commerce et de Gestion, Université Ibn Tofail, Kénitra, Maroc

Albawwat, I., & Frijat, Y. A. (2021). An analysis of auditors' perceptions towards artificial intelligence and its contribution to audit quality. Accounting, 7(4), 755-762.

Alotaibi, E. M. (2023). Risk assessment using predictive analytics. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(5), e01723. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i5.1723

Belhaj, H., & Al Meriouh, Y. (2024). Industrie comptable au Maroc : analyse descriptive et perspectives d'amélioration. Revue Internationale des Sciences de Gestion, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14025081

Benhayoun, I., Bougrine, S., & Sassioui, A. (2025). Readiness for artificial intelligence adoption by auditors in emerging countries – a PLS-SEM analysis of Moroccan firms. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(4), 1486-1508. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-07-2024-0448

Bouquin, H. (2004). Le contrôle de gestion (6e éd.). Presses Universitaires de France.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Eddaoudi, F., & Tessoudali, H. (2026). Artificial intelligence and the productivity paradox: Between promises and empirical evidence. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference “Science and Innovation in a Globalized World” (pp. 17-21). Research Europe. https://doi.org/10.64076/iedc260504.03

Fedyk, A., Hodson, J., Khimich, N., & Fedyk, T. (2022). Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process? Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), 938-985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09697-x

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.

Fonds Monétaire Arabe (FMA). (2025). Rapport sur l'indice de préparation à l'intelligence artificielle dans les pays arabes. Fonds Monétaire Arabe.

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.

Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5-14.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2018). Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements. IFAC.

Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2021). Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Kassar, M., & Jizi, M. (2026). Artificial intelligence and robotic process automation in auditing and accounting: A systematic literature review. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 27(1), 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-05-2024-0175

KPMG. (2026). KPMG Global AI Pulse Survey. KPMG International.

Kokina, J., Blanchette, S., Davenport, T. H., & Pachamanova, D. (2025). Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in auditing: Evidence from the field. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56, 100734.

Lee, M. C., & Tajudeen, F. P. (2020). Usage and impact of artificial intelligence on accounting: Evidence from Malaysian organisations. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 13(1), 213-240.

Manita, R., Elommal, N., Baudier, P., & Hikkerova, L. (2020). The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119751.

Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Rahman, M. J., Zhu, H., & Yue, L. (2024). Does the adoption of artificial intelligence by audit firms and their clients affect audit quality and efficiency? Evidence from China. Managerial Auditing Journal, 39(6), 668-699. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-03-2023-3846

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

Tietz, W. M., Cainas, J. M., & Miller-Nobles, T. L. (2020). Robotic process automation: Considerations for the auditor. Current Issues in Auditing, 14(2), C1-C11.

Tiron-Tudor, A., Lacurezeanu, R., Bresfelean, V. P., & Dontu, A. N. (2024). Perspectives on how robotic process automation is transforming accounting and auditing services. Accounting Perspectives, 23(1), 7-38.

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433-460.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

 

Published

2026-11-03

How to Cite

Eddaoudi, F., & Tessoudali, H. (2026). Artificial Intelligence Adoption and Perceived Audit Engagement Performance: An Empirical Study of Moroccan Auditors. International Journal of Research in Economics and Finance, 3(10-2), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.71420/ijref.v3i10-2.433

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.